Drug Testing in Blood: Validated Negative-Ion Chemical Ionization Gas Chromatographic-Mass Spectrometric Assay for Enantioselective Measurement of the Designer Drugs 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine, 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), and 3,4-Methylenedioxyethylamphetamine and Its Application to Samples from a Controlled Study with MDMA
by
Peters FT, Samyn N, Lamers CT, Riedel WJ,
Kraemer T, de Boeck G, Maurer HH.
Department of Experimental and Clinical Toxicology,
Institute of Experimental
and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology,
University of Saarland,
Homburg, Germany.
Clin Chem. 2005 Aug 11
ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: The enantiomers of the designer drugs 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), and 3,4-methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDEA) differ in their pharmacologic and toxicologic potency. The aim of this study was to develop an assay for measuring these enantiomers in small plasma volumes and to analyze samples from a controlled study with MDMA. METHODS: The analytes were extracted from =0.2 mL of plasma by mixed-mode solid-phase extraction. After derivatization with S-(-)-heptafluorobutyrylprolyl chloride, the resulting diastereomers were separated by gas chromatography (HP-5MS) within 17 min and detected by mass spectrometry in the negative-ion chemical ionization mode. The method was fully validated and applied to samples from a controlled study in which a single dose of racemic MDMA (75 mg) was administered. RESULTS: The derivatized enantiomers were well separated and detected with good sensitivity. The assay was linear (per enantiomer) at 1-50 microg/L for MDA and 5-250 microg/L for MDMA and MDEA. Analytical recovery, accuracy, repeatability, and intermediate precision data were within required limits. Extraction yields were 82.1%-95.3%. In the study samples, concentrations of R-(-)-MDMA significantly exceeded those of S-(+)-MDMA. Their ratios (R vs S) were always >1.0 and increased over time. Concentrations of S-(+)-MDA exceeded those of R-(-)-MDA, their ratios (R vs S) also increasing over time but remaining <1.0. CONCLUSIONS: This assay enables sensitive, reliable, and fast enantioselective measurement of MDA, MDMA, and MDEA in small volumes of plasma. The controlled study data confirm previous findings of MDMA and MDA enantiomer ratios (R vs S) increasing over time after ingestion of racemic MDMA.MTA
PMA
PMMA
History
TFMPP
Hair testing
Controversies
Protect and survive
MDMA/Ecstasy drug screening
Drug tests: immunoassay comparisons
False positives in immunoassay screening results
and further reading
Refs
HOME
HedWeb
Nootropics
cocaine.wiki
Future Opioids
BLTC Research
MDMA/Ecstasy
Superhapiness?
Utopian Surgery?
The Abolitionist Project
The Hedonistic Imperative
The Reproductive Revolution
Critique of Huxley's Brave New World
The Good Drug Guide
The Responsible Parent's Guide
To Healthy Mood Boosters For All The Family